Option Focus | Alibaba’s $9.92 Million In-The-Money Short Put Calendar Signals Premium Collection, While Cross-Expiry Hedged Structure Reveals Cautious Bearish Bias

Option Witch
Yesterday

Alibaba closed at $105.70, down 1.21 percent.

Large options flow showed institutional caution despite heavy premium collection. The dominant trade was a $9.92 million net-credit short put calendar with all legs in the money. A second multi-leg cross-expiry structure added defined downside protection while taking in $169,800. Overall flow leaned bearish to cautious, favoring income generation and hedged positioning over a clean upside breakout.

>>>Start OPTIONS trading & earn up to SGD 200 in rewards!

Options Indicators

Alibaba’s implied volatility is 42.02%, and with an IV percentile of 22.71%, current option volatility sits on the low side relative to its own recent history, indicating that options are cheaply priced rather than expensive. At the same time, the IV/HV ratio of 1.26 shows implied volatility is still running above realized volatility, meaning the market is pricing in somewhat more movement ahead than what has recently been observed, but not at an extreme level.

The Call/Put volume ratio is 2.03.

Large Trades

A put-selling combination with a net credit of $9.92 million was the dominant large trade of the day, structured as a three-leg calendar put position made up of short 130.0 puts expiring on 2026-10-16 and two separate blocks of short 118.0 puts expiring on 2026-10-09. All three legs were in the money versus the reference stock price of 105.735, making this an aggressive premium-collection trade with meaningful downside exposure if BABA weakens further. Because the position consists entirely of sold puts across expirations, it is best viewed as a cross-expiry short-put structure rather than a synthetic, and its strategic intent appears to be income generation combined with a moderately constructive-to-stable view that the stock can hold up over time despite near-term risk.

A four-leg cross-expiry call-and-put combination with a net credit of $169,800 was the second highlighted trade, featuring a short 110.0 call and long 99.0 put in the 2026-10-16 expiry, alongside a long 112.0 call and long 100.0 put in the 2026-10-09 expiry. This is not a synthetic call or synthetic put because it does not pair a buy call with a sell put or a buy put with a sell call as a two-leg equivalent; instead, it is a multi-leg cross-expiry structure that mixes upside call exposure with downside put protection while still bringing in a modest credit. With the 110.0 and 112.0 calls out of the money and the 99.0 and 100.0 puts also out of the money, the trade looks like a hedged volatility or event-positioning strategy rather than a simple outright directional bet, suggesting the trader wanted defined optionality around a price move while keeping initial cost favorable.

Overall, the large-trade flow leans bearish to cautious on BABA. While the biggest ticket item was a substantial in-the-money short-put premium sale that can be interpreted as constructive if the stock stabilizes, the broader block activity still shows a defensive tone: the mixed four-leg cross-expiry package emphasizes protection and flexible exposure, and the full bulk-order picture tilts toward downside-related positioning. Taken together, institutional traders appear to be expressing limited confidence in a clean upside breakout and are instead favoring premium collection, hedged structures, and a generally cautious stance with a slight bearish bias.

Strategy Reference

For a defined-risk posture, consider a bear put spread using out-of-the-money 100.00/95.00 puts; sellers seeking low assignment probability could focus on the 90.00 put where delta and probability of expiring in the money remain well below the at-the-money strikes.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Most Discussed

  1. 1
     
     
     
     
  2. 2
     
     
     
     
  3. 3
     
     
     
     
  4. 4
     
     
     
     
  5. 5
     
     
     
     
  6. 6
     
     
     
     
  7. 7
     
     
     
     
  8. 8
     
     
     
     
  9. 9
     
     
     
     
  10. 10